- Images
- Historical Photographs
- Important Issues: Waste Management, Real Estate, Beach Loss, Public Access, Fresh Water
- Round One Visualization
- 3 Ft. Sea Level Change Map
- go there!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
There are six ongoing conversations for this study. Visit each one, familiarize yourself with the information provided, and post your thoughts. Go to our main web page at http://www.bryanquinn.org/coastalchange
5 comments:
Ilana said...
I'm interested in the new development plan-- The Breakers-- pictured in the "images" section. People buy/rent condominiums as close to the beach as possible, even if they run the risk of flood damage. But isn't there an environmental agency to monitor and restrict this kind of development, within the 100 year flood zone?
I'm not sure how we can both regenerate beach areas and accommodate consumer demand for oceanside views. Can regenerative design meet such demands?
Check out this new article in the ProJo the other day:
http://www.projo.com/ri/southkingstown/content/SC_SKWALL9_01-12-07_943Q01F.2c7fcb8.html
I am curious about the cause of the erosion in this local area. Erosion, especially against sandy shores, is a very natural phenomenon.
Is there a solution, or even a desire for a solution? Or is the issue that we need not build so close to the coast?
Why should a person care about erosion, except for when it pertains to property damage if it is a natural process? I know why I care about it, but I just wanted to start a discussion . . .
All sandy coasts are essentially rivers of sand, with natural flow, displacement, and deposition of materials. So why is it important to try to stop this process locally?
It boggles me that these places are so expensive but not at all a long term investment. They dissolve into the ocean - which is a natural process.
Is there a way to place more temporary structures in these locations?
How do we register the rise of the ocean's water? What is the control? To an educated eye we can understand the process of erosion but do the people buying those houses understand the potential devastation that could occur?
Carolyn
Everybody is hitting on the same issue. This site is not workable. Land value in this area would have to go way up to provide a bridge and considerable engineering. This place will have to be an island fortress to have anything close to a sustainable landscape.
Regeneration is not possible here unless all permenant human interface is removed. As with my current home in south florida, I see long-term occupation as temporary, seasonal, and low-impact. Huts, yurts, and tents on this site or pay the cost.
Post a Comment